Federal Sex Crimes: Offenses, Penalties, and SORNA

No image available
18 U.S.C. Pt I, Ch. 109A covers federal sexual abuse crimes. Sexual abuse, codified in §2242, criminalizes three types of conduct. First, the section criminalizes using threats or fear to coerce another person to engage in a sexual act.

18 U.S.C. Pt I, Ch. 109A covers federal sexual abuse crimes. Sexual abuse, codified in §2242, criminalizes three types of conduct. First, the section criminalizes using threats or fear to coerce another person to engage in a sexual act. The section also criminalizes engaging in a sexual act with another person who is incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct or is physically incapable of declining participation in the conduct. Finally, the section criminalizes engaging in any sexual act with another person without that person’s consent. Sexual abuse under §2242 is punishable by imprisonment for any term of years, including life imprisonment. The charges rise to aggravated sexual abuse under §2241 when the sexual act is induced by force, or by threats or fear of death, kidnapping, or serious injury. The offense can also be aggravated when the offender renders another person unconscious, or either forcibly or without the other person’s knowledge, causes the person to ingest a substance that impairs that person’s ability to control or appraise subsequent sexual acts. Age of the victim can also aggravate a sexual offense, if the conduct occurs with a person under the age of 12, or a person between the ages of 12 and 16 when the offender is more than four years older than the victim. Federal statute also criminalizes sexual acts with a minor, a ward, or an individual in Federal custody in §2243.

The case of United States v. Reed, heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, illustrates the Court’s treatment of these offenses. In Reed, the defendant was charged with one count of aggravated sexual abuse under §2241 but plead guilty to sexual abuse under §2242 in a written plea agreement. As part of the plea agreement, the defendant agreed to face the maximum statutory sentence, life imprisonment, with the Court maintaining authority to impose a sentence that is more or less severe. Due to his acknowledgement of sentencing deviations as part of his plea agreement and the egregiousness of the sexual abuse conduct, the Court affirmed his 360-month sentence.

§2244 provides sentencing guidelines for abusive sexual contact, with reference to the offenses outlines in §§2241-2243. If an offender commits a sexual act classifiable as aggravated sexual abuse for reasons other than the age of the victim, the offender shall be imprisoned not more than ten years. When the aggravated sexual abuse is related to the victim’s age, the imprisonment is for any term of years, including life imprisonment. For any sexual act constituting sexual abuse under §2242, the associated sentence is no more than three years’ imprisonment. A sexual act with a minor between the ages of 12 years and 16 years, when the perpetrator is four years or more older than the minor, or a sexual act with a ward or individual in Federal custody are all punishable by no more than two years’ imprisonment. Any act of sexual contact without the other person’s permission not otherwise covered is punishable by not more than two years imprisonment. When any act of sexual contact involves a child under the age of twelve, the associated maximum sentence is doubled.

Federal law also criminalizes sex trafficking, with transportation-related sexual activity and crimes covered by 18 U.S.C. Pt. I, Ch. 117. In general, transporting any individual in interstate or foreign commerce with intent for the individual to engage in prostitution or illegal sexual activity is criminalized, and punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment. Facilitating the prostitution or trafficking of another person is punishment is similarly punishable by no more than 10 years in prison. The punishment is increased to up to 25 years’ imprisonment when the offender facilitating the activity either facilitates the prostitution of five or more persons or acts with reckless disregard to the sex trafficking nature of the conduct. For aggravated offenses, victims may also recover civil remedies. Under §2422, persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing any individual to travel interstate for prostitution or sexual activity purposes is punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment. If the crime involves a minor under the age of 18, the minimum sentence is 10 years’ imprisonment. When the act goes beyond coercion and the offender is knowingly transporting the minor, the crime is covered by §2423. If the travel is committed with the intent for the minor to engage in criminal sexual activity, the minimum sentence is 10 years in prison. If the intended conduct includes illicit sexual conduct, the maximum sentence is 30 years’ imprisonment, whether the travel be interstate or through foreign commerce. Attempts and conspiracy are punished in the same manner as the completed offense itself. After a prior sex offense conviction, sex trafficking offenses are punishable by three times the original sentence associated with the offense.

Recent decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit offer further clarity into the applications of the federal sex trafficking statutes. In the case of United States v. Muldrew, the Court held that multiple separate offenses involving the same minor victim were sufficient to create a “pattern,” therefore upholding an aggravated sentence for the defendant’s sex trafficking activities. The Court also recently addressed sex trafficking of children under §1591 in the case of United States v. Walker. Under the section, knowingly recruiting, transporting, or soliciting a person in interstate commerce, or benefiting financially from such a venture, by using force, fraud, or coercion to cause the minor to engage in a sex act is criminalized. The statute provides a 15-year minimum sentence for offenses involving force, threats, or coercion, or involving victims under the age of 14. When the victim was between the ages of 14 and 18 years, and the offender did not use force or coercion in the process of committing the offense, the minimum sentence is 10 years. In both circumstances, the offender can be sentenced to life in prison. In Walker, the Court clarified the definition of “serious harm” required to constitute coercion. Finding that nonphysical threats, including psychological, financial, or reputational harm, constitute serious harm so long as the threats are sufficiently serious, and therefore brought the defendant’s behavior within the meaning of the statute. In both cases, the Court construed the statutes broadly, enabling harsh punishments against defendants convicted of sex trafficking offenses.

The offense of sexual exploitation of children is defined in 18 U.S.C. §2251. Broadly, the section prohibits using any measures, including persuading, coercing, employing, or transporting, a minor for the purpose of having the minor engage in sexually explicit conduct to produce or transmit a visual depiction of the conduct. Any parent or guardian who knowingly permits or assists in such conduct is similarly punished. Generally, the offense is punishable by prison time between (15) – (30) years’ imprisonment. If the offender has engaged in a past offense involving the sexual abuse of children, or any State offenses related to sexual abuse, sex trafficking of children, or child pornography, the sentencing range increases, with an associated punishment of between 25 and 50 years’ imprisonment. If the offender has two or more prior convictions for the aforementioned crimes, the offender faces a minimum of 35 years’ imprisonment, and can receive a life sentence. If the conduct causes the death of a person, the sentence ranges from 30 years’ imprisonment to life. The Eleventh Circuit clarified the breadth of this statute in the case of United States v. Bracero-Navas. On appeal, the defendant challenged a jury instruction stating that otherwise innocent conduct may fall within the reach of §2251 based on the actions of the individual creating the depiction. The Court found, however, that the instruction was derived from an earlier Eleventh Circuit decision and was an appropriate statement of the law. Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction, which subjected the defendant to 480 months’ imprisonment followed by 15 years’ supervised release.

A variety of activities related to child pornography are criminalized under 18 U.S.C. §2252A. The section broadly criminalizes activities involving the knowing transport, distribution, receipt, reproduction, or advertisement of child pornography through interstate or foreign commerce. The statute also specifically addresses the distribution of child pornography to minors, specifically criminalizing such conduct for the purpose of inducing the minor to participate in illegal activity. Offenses involving the distribution, receipt, or reproduction of child pornography are punishable by 5-20 years’ imprisonment, but the sentence increases to 15-40 years’ imprisonment for offenders with prior sexual abuse, sex trafficking, or child pornography convictions. Possessing or accessing child pornography in U.S. territories is addressed by 18 U.S.C. §2252A(a)(5). A first offense for possessing or accessing child pornography has a maximum associated sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment, but for content depicting a prepubescent minor under the age of 12, the maximum sentence is doubled to 20 years. If the offender has a prior conviction for sexual abuse, sex trafficking, child pornography, or related offenses, the offense is punishable by between (10) and (20) years’ imprisonment. The production of “deepfake” adapted or modified child pornography of an identifiable minor with intent to distribute through interstate or foreign commerce is punishable by up to 15 years’ imprisonment. When the activity is part of a broader child exploitation enterprise, involving three or more separate instances and more than one victim, while concerting with three or more persons, the offender must be sentenced to a minimum of 20 years’ imprisonment, with the possibility of a life sentence. §2252A also provides a civil cause of action for any person aggrieved by the conduct criminalized under the statute, offering further remedies for victims of child pornography.

The Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed a conviction for possession of child pornography in the case of United States v. Morris. The defendant challenged his conviction on the basis of knowledge, as §225A specifically prohibits the knowing possession of child pornography. The Court clarified that “possession” in the context of the statute is broad, and includes merely viewing images on a computer, as the images are taken into the control of the accessor. Therefore, the existence of any violating images on the defendant’s personal devices were “possessed” by the defendant. The Court also found that the defendant knowingly possessed the content, because the content was accessed on devices in his exclusive control. Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction.

The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, or SORNA, is codified in 34 U.S.C. §§20911-20932. Under the act, each jurisdiction must contain a sex offender registry that is compliant with the Attorney General’s guidelines. §20913 requires sex offenders to register in any jurisdiction where that person lives, works, or attends school. The registration must remain current, and keep the proper jurisdictions informed of any changes in residence, employment, or education.

The act also established three separate tiers of sex offenders. The term “tier III sex offender” applies when the offense is punishable by more than one year in prison and the offense is comparable to or more severe than aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual contact against a minor younger than 13-years-old. Tier III also encompasses offenses involving the kidnapping a minor, and subsequent offenses committed by a tier II sex offender. Tier II imposes an identical sentence requirement but applies to offenses comparable to or more severe than sex trafficking, coercion and enticement, transportation with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and abusive sexual contact. This tier also encompasses offenses that involve the use of a minor in a sexual performance, the solicitation of a minor to practice prostitution, or the production or distribution of child pornography. Subsequent offenses by a tier I sex offender also cause the offender to be classified as a tier II sex offender. Tier I broadly encompasses other sex offenders that do not fall within tier II or tier III.

Depending on the tier of the sex offense, the duration of the registration period varies. For tier I sex offenders, registration is only required for 15 years. For tier II sex offenders, the duration increases to 25 years. Tier III sex offenders must register for life. After maintaining a clean record for 10 years, a tier I sex offender can reduce the registration period by 5 years. Tier III offenders adjudicated delinquent may, after maintaining a clean record for 25 years, reduce their registration period from life to the end of the 25-year period.

34 USC §20920 requires each jurisdiction to make certain information from the sex offender registry publicly available on the Internet. This policy allows concerned citizens to learn relevant information about registered offenders within a specific geographical area. The Act also requires the Attorney General to maintain a national database of registered sex offenders for law enforcement purposes. Although the National Sex Offender Registry is kept by the FBI, the information is also accessible to the general public via the National Sex Offender Public Website, maintained by the Attorney General. This service functions analogously to the sex offender registries of each individual jurisdiction. When sex offenders fail to register, the act grants authority for law enforcement to ensure compliance.

If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama, or any federal jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit, including Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Ingram Law, LLC at 205-335-2640. Get Relief Get Results.

articles

Blogs

1 / 44
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles
Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

In a case that highlights the complex issues of marital property division during divorce proceedings, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the appeal of Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr. Arising from Baldwin County, this case addresses the appeals of both the husband and the wife, demonstrating the intricate nature of property classification and division through six main points of contention. If you need a Divorce Lawyer, Please contact us about your case.

read articles
The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

In a case that highlights broader systemic issues in the American justice system, the United States Supreme Court recently declined to review a controversial Alabama murder conviction. At this stage, the case of McCrory v. Alabama has been tumultuous for a man who continues to maintain his innocence. The increasing public attention directed towards the challenges defendants face when seeking exonerations is creating legislative pressure for reform, offering hope for a more just future.

read articles
latest-news

Pretrial Matters in Federal Court: How to Make Bond, Detention Hearings, and other Pretrial Functions

18 U.S.C. §3154 describes the functions and powers relating to pretrial services. The statute includes 14 particular functions, and a broader clause allowing the performance of any other functions specified under the chapter.

read articles
latest-news

The Interplay Between Lesser-Included Offenses and Double Jeopardy: The Case of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama

In a case that provides important clarification about double jeopardy when certain charges were reduced to their lesser-included offenses, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over the appeal of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama.

read articles
The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama

The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama

In a case that clarifies the bounds of jurisdiction for mandamus petitions, the Alabama Court of Appeals recently heard an appeal arising from Mobile County. This case, Ex Parte State of Alabama, explores trial court jurisdiction time limits without a stay, defining when new judgments can be issued, and orders enforced.

read articles
The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination

The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination

In a case that illustrates the high bar for terminating parental rights in child custody matters, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Baldwin County. This case, W.C.M. v. M.P., addresses a mother’s efforts to terminate the father’s parental rights, highlighting the complex and sensitive nature of proceedings seeking extreme legal remedies.

read articles
180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe

180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe

In a case addressing multiple facets of criminal procedure, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from DeKalb County. This case, Travis Eugene Wolfe v. State of Alabama, demonstrates the breadth of trial court discretion when compounding consecutive sentences, while exploring the procedural and evidentiary requirements forming the basis for Wolfe’s conviction.

read articles
Drug Crimes in Alabama Both State and Federal Charges

Drug Crimes in Alabama Both State and Federal Charges

In Alabama, drugs are everywhere, both recreational and illegal. Drug charges carry significant jail time for distribution and trafficking, Alabama also criminalizes a wide array of drug offenses. Drug possession and sale offenses are covered by §13A-12-210 to §13A-12-219 of the Alabama Code.

read articles
Evidence of Prejudice: Joseph Michael Wilson and the Importance of Supporting Both Prongs of the Strickland Test

Evidence of Prejudice: Joseph Michael Wilson and the Importance of Supporting Both Prongs of the Strickland Test

In a case highlighting the extensive requirements to succeed under a Rule 32 petition, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Madison County. This case, Joseph Michael Wilson v. State of Alabama, illustrates the high evidentiary bar that criminal defendants must meet when alleging prejudice arising from ineffective assistance of counsel, demonstrating the high level of deference courts give to attorneys when determining trial strategy.

read articles
latest-news

Mens Rea: The Importance of Proving Intent In a Criminal Case

If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640.

read articles
latest-news

Rape And Sex Crimes in Alabama

Alabama law criminalizes a variety of sexual offenses, the most severe charges being for rape and sodomy. Charges for rape and sodomy in Alabama are classified based on the degree of the offense. Rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, governed by §13A-6-61 and §13A-6-63 respectively, are both classified as Class A felonies.

read articles
latest-news

Fraud In a Divorce: Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts

In a case that clarifies the court’s power to address acts of fraud, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal originating in Mobile County. This case, Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts, addresses fraud in the context of a divorce judgment, emphasizing the court’s authority to handle such scenarios.

read articles
latest-news

Constitutional Standing and Proof of Intent: The Case of Johnnie Leeanozg DavisConstitutional Standing and Proof of Intent: The Case of Johnnie Leeanozg Davis

In a case that clarifies several principles of criminal procedure, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.

read articles
Double Jeopardy in a Single Trial: The Case of Altonio Spencer

Double Jeopardy in a Single Trial: The Case of Altonio Spencer

In a case that illustrates the interplay of Alabama’s sentencing laws, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard an appeal originating in Mobile County. This case, Altonio Spencer v. State of Alabama, explores the proper application of the Habitual Felony Offenders Act and clarifies the Double Jeopardy Clause’s applicability when one conviction is included within another.

read articles
latest-news

Federal Sex Crimes: Offenses, Penalties, and SORNA

18 U.S.C. Pt I, Ch. 109A covers federal sexual abuse crimes. Sexual abuse, codified in §2242, criminalizes three types of conduct. First, the section criminalizes using threats or fear to coerce another person to engage in a sexual act.

read articles
Definitions: Exploring the Effect of Statutory Language on Protection Orders

Definitions: Exploring the Effect of Statutory Language on Protection Orders

In a case that dives into evidentiary standards and proper applications of the law, a case arising from Lee County recently made its way to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals. In the case of P.T.S. III v. S.S., the Court reviewed an elder-abuse protection order, clarifying evidentiary requirements and addressing the relevance and applicability of the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act.

read articles
latest-news

Sex Crimes And Computer Crimes in Alabama

Sexual Offenses are also recognized based on their relationship to technology. §13A-6-111 criminalizes transmitting obscene materials to a child by computer, classifying the crime as a Class B felony.

read articles
latest-news

Concurrent Split Sentences: Interpreting Sentencing Guidelines in Alabama Criminal Cases

In a case that clarifies the permissibility of concurrent split sentences, the Supreme Court of Alabama recently presided over the case of Ex parte Courtney Rayshun Elston.

read articles
Revocation Procedure: The Delicate Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Due Process

Revocation Procedure: The Delicate Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Due Process

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from Marion County, affirming the enduring significance of procedural rights in revocation proceedings. This case, Brandon Colby Hayes v. State of Alabama, clarifies the procedural necessity of a formal revocation hearing for community-corrections placements, thereby extending the policy for probation revocation in this area.

read articles
latest-news

THCA: The Unaddressed Cannabinoid in Federal Hemp Legislation

Six years ago, the Hemp Farming Act of 2018 went into effect as federal law, legalizing certain marijuana derivatives as “hemp.”

read articles
FaceTime Testimony: The Procedural Limits of Audiovisual Technology

FaceTime Testimony: The Procedural Limits of Audiovisual Technology

In a case exploring the procedural side of child custody, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal that began in the Cullman Juvenile Court in Cullman County. The case of T.S. v. Cullman County Department of Human Resources and D.W. delves into the admissibility of remote testimony under relevant Alabama law, which permits such testimony only under specific compelling circumstances.

read articles
latest-news

Murder, Manslaughter And Criminally Negligent Homicide in Alabama

In Alabama, there are three major criminal charges associated with homicide. The first and most severe is murder, governed by §13A-6-2 of the Alabama Code. Unlike some other jurisdictions, Alabama does not recognize varying degrees of murder.

read articles
Calls for Reform: Background Checks in the Case of Chrisopher Bauer

Calls for Reform: Background Checks in the Case of Chrisopher Bauer

Alabama law enforcement is facing calls for reform in their hiring process. The public response was inspired when FBI agent Christopher Bauer was convicted last month for sexually assaulting a minor while employed as a state trooper. Bauer’s sentencing, potentially facing life imprisonment, is set for the beginning of August. Bauer began working for the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency in 2019, after state police conducted “a full and thorough” background check. However, Bauer had been fired from the FBI in New Orlean’s the previous year due to allegations of sexual assault, harassment, and several other policy violations, with his victims providing harrowing testimony detailing the encounters. In spite of this record, Bauer was still able to gain employment with the Alabama state police, raising questions about the system of background checks and inter-agency communication practices currently in place.

read articles
latest-news

Definition of Domestic Violence

Domestic violence is a pervasive issue that manifests in various forms, affecting individuals regardless of age, gender, or socioeconomic status.

read articles
Demystifying the Burden of Proof: Lessons from Duarel Kelly’s Probation Revocation

Demystifying the Burden of Proof: Lessons from Duarel Kelly’s Probation Revocation

In a case emphasizing the importance of meeting the evidentiary burden in all criminal proceedings, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals recently heard the appeal of Daurel Eugene Kelly v. State of Alabama, arising from Baldwin County. Kelly’s appeal underscores the high standard of proof required in probation revocation hearings, following the same principles as other criminal proceedings.

read articles
Domestic Violence Charges in Alabama

Domestic Violence Charges in Alabama

The Alabama Code also criminalizes specific violent offenses within the home and family. Alabama recognizes three degrees of domestic violence, criminalizing actions against current and former spouses, relatives, household members, and former and current romantic partners, with all three degrees covering different crimes against this same group.

read articles
Reversable Error: The Balance Between Prejudicial Evidence and Defendant’s Rights

Reversable Error: The Balance Between Prejudicial Evidence and Defendant’s Rights

In a case illustrating the importance of remedies for errors causing significant prejudice against a criminal defendant, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal originating from the heart of Montgomery County. This case, D.M.G. v. State of Alabama, explores the impact of an extraneous document on a criminal defendant’s trial, ultimately resulting in the grant of a new trial.

read articles
Previous Convictions Can Be Used Against You

Previous Convictions Can Be Used Against You

A previous conviction may be used when you testify in a criminal trial. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Safeguarding Rights: The Role of Evidentiary Rules in the Case of Toney R. Harvell

Safeguarding Rights: The Role of Evidentiary Rules in the Case of Toney R. Harvell

In a case that highlights the importance of evidentiary rules at trial, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Madison County. This case, Toney R. Harvell v. City of Huntsville, explores Rule 404(b) of the Alabama Rules of Evidence, illustrating how evidentiary rules can serve as safeguards for defendants’ rights.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Kidnapping in Alabama

Kidnapping is only classified in Alabama using two degrees. The less severe offense, kidnapping in the second degree, is a Class B felony governed by §13A-6-44.

read articles
Human Trafficking and Elder Abuse Crimes in Alabama

Human Trafficking and Elder Abuse Crimes in Alabama

Human trafficking is also heavily addressed within the Alabama Code. Human trafficking in the second degree under §13A-6-153 is classified as a Class B felony, punishable by 2-20 years’ imprisonment. The offense requires an offender to knowingly benefit from participation in a venture for the purpose of servitude, or if an offender knowingly obtains control over another person for the purpose of servitude.

read articles
latest-news

The Case of Fred Plump: Alabama’s Battle Against Political Corruption Continues As Usual

In the conclusion of an intense and high-profile legal battle, former Alabama lawmaker Fred Plump was sentenced to one year and one day in prison, along with three years of supervised release and a $196,150.45 repayment of funds. The sentence reflects Plump’s involvement in a kickback scheme where public funds were diverted from their intended use for community service.

read articles
Rehabilitative vs. Periodic Alimony: The Necessary Findings

Rehabilitative vs. Periodic Alimony: The Necessary Findings

At the heart of Etowah County, a recent case made its way to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, emphasizing the importance of strictly adhering to statutory requirements in divorce proceedings. This case, Nathan Wayne Jones v. Martha Dale Jones, illustrates this concept by analyzing of the alimony award in a divorce judgment and outlining the proper guidelines for awarding periodic and rehabilitative alimony.

read articles
The Crimes of Burglary And Robbery in Alabama

The Crimes of Burglary And Robbery in Alabama

Another major crime is burglary, categorized by varying degrees in Alabama. The most severe burglary charge is burglary in the first degree, governed by §13A-7-5. To commit an act of burglary in the first degree, the offender must knowingly and unlawfully enter or remain in a building with the intent to commit a felony, and must also be armed with explosives, cause physical injury to another, or either use or threaten to use a deadly weapon that the offender is armed with.

read articles
The Licensing, Legal Disputes, and Logistics of Alabama’s Medical Cannabis Industry

The Licensing, Legal Disputes, and Logistics of Alabama’s Medical Cannabis Industry

Over the last several years, cannabis use has been cemented as a hot-button political topic, with states across the country proposing and passing legislation to allow, limit, and regulate its use. Although most of the mainstream conversation is centered around the ethics and physical effects of marijuana use, the legalization of medical cannabis use has created a myriad of legal and administrative challenges hidden from the purview of public discussion. Behind the scenes of this intense debate, licensing battles are unfolding in Alabama’s court system, with the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission finding itself at the heart of the controversy. As Alabama continues working to implement the necessary infrastructure to streamline the medical use of cannabis, these issues are increasingly coming to light, raising the question: how should the logistics be handled?

read articles

schedule a consultation

Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.