The Difficulties of Maintaining a Summary Judgment

Image related with this article: The Difficulties of Maintaining a Summary Judgment
Learn how a seemingly simple legal win through summary judgment was reversed in Alonso v. Alpha Phi due to unresolved factual disputes and procedural missteps.

Sometimes, a fact seems so obvious that it doesn’t warrant further discussion. Humoring a debate in this case is a redundant waste of our time, and we are all better off avoiding them. In a court of law, a conceptually similar instrument exists that allows one side to get its way without having to hold a trial. If the material facts are undisputed such that there is only one conceivable outcome, a court, upon request, can save time and resources by handing down judgment without a full trial. However, because everyone by default has a right to a trial and the chance of even a minor dispute appearing in the facts is high, this remedy is not granted lightly. Even if someone is fortunate enough to have judgment granted in his favor, it can always be reversed if the other side shows even the slightest signs of dispute to the appellate court. Such is the story of Alonso v. Alpha Phi International, Inc.

In an agreement between Jennifer Alonso and the Beta Mu Chapter of Alpha Phi International, Alonso entered Membership and Housing Agreements at the University of Alabama in February 2022, where she was expected to pay membership and housing fees to Alpha Phi as well as meal costs. Both agreements were co-signed by Alonso’s mother, Irasema Ramos Encinas, who assumed joint and several liability for her daughter’s obligations. This meant that any breach of the agreement on their part would result in both Encinas and Alonso being held legally responsible.

When Alonso defaulted on the contract by not making her monthly payments after being prompted to do so, Alpha Phi filed a complaint in the Tuscaloosa District Court, Tuscaloosa Alabama against her and Encinas on August 30, 2023. Alonso left an outstanding balance of $7,344.35, plus an additional $1,836.08 for attorney’s fees, totaling to $9,180.43. The case was then moved to the Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court. Alonso and Encinas asserted numerous defenses, including unconscionability, estoppel, waiver, Alpha Phi’s own breach of the contract, and its supposed violation of the Alabama Uniform Landlord & Tenant Act. 

Alpha Phi sought summary judgment in its favor on February 20, 2024. Also known as judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment resolves a suit without having to conduct an actual trial. However, for this motion to be granted, the party who proposes it, called the movant, must show that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and that there is no genuine dispute as to any material facts in the case. Theoretically, this means that if even one out of a million reasonable juries finds that a genuine dispute exists in the material facts, summary judgment is inappropriate. When considering summary judgment, courts also must give the nonmoving party the benefit of the doubt by viewing the evidence in a light that favors it the most. 

Despite these obstacles, the Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court granted Alpha Phi’s motion for summary judgment on May 17, 2024, awarding it the full $9,180,43, plus costs and interest. It also granted the motion to strike the defendants’ counterclaim that alleged wrongful termination of Alonso’s membership, unlawful ouster from housing without a hearing, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, as their new defenses were waived by not being included in their first answer. 

In addition, Alonso and Encinas filed a third-party complaint against Waldrop & Associates, P.C. for its agents’ alleged attempt to contact and collect debt from Alonso while she was represented by counsel- a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Alpha Phi’s motion to strike this complaint was also granted by the Circuit Court. 

Alonso and Encinas appealed to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals on June 26, 2024, seeking to reverse summary judgment against them and to reverse the striking of their third-party complaint and counterclaim. 

The decision to strike the third-party complaint was upheld by the appellate court. Although non-parties can be added to the suit after the original date of its filing, this option is only available if the non-party’s alleged misconduct arose from the same event that incited the original complaint. As such, because Waldrop’s violation of the FDCPA was a separate incident that occurred independently from the breach of contract, including it in the suit would have been improper.

As for the counterclaim, the Court of Appeals was unable to determine whether the Circuit Court’s decision to strike it was reasonable because the transcript of the hearing that introduced the counterclaim did not appear in Alonso and Encina’s record of appeal. With no evidence to suggest otherwise, the appellate court therefore affirmed the decision to strike, presuming that the Circuit Court’s decision was supported by the evidence. 

However, as is the typical cause of most summary judgment reversals, Alonso and Encinas managed to convince the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals to reverse the summary judgment decision by showing that there was a genuine issue of material fact at play. Specifically, because some of the elements of their answer were not addressed by Alpha Phi in their motion for summary judgment- namely the unconscionability, estoppel, and waiver elements- parts of the answer were not refuted. By not refuting these claims, their materiality remained in question, and as such, the summary judgment decision was reversed. 

The main takeaway in Alonso v. Alpha Phi International, Inc. is that even when the law is mostly on your side, summary judgment is a drastic measure that courts must be convinced to take. Therefore, it behooves those seeking it to double check the record and leave no stone unturned to ensure that there are no elements left unresolved. The point of summary judgment is that there is nothing further to discuss about the facts, so an unanswered question, no matter how minute, is enough to prevent it from proceeding.

If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Joe Ingram Law, LLC at 205-335-2640. Get Relief * Get Results.

 


articles

Blogs

1 / 44
United States v. Zayas: The Bank Secrecy Act

United States v. Zayas: The Bank Secrecy Act

Explore the United States v. Zayas decision and learn how structuring financial transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act’s $10,000 reporting threshold can lead to federal criminal charges. Understand the standards courts use to determine willful evasion under this law.

read articles
Can You Go to Jail for Not Paying Child Support?

Can You Go to Jail for Not Paying Child Support?

Find out if you can go to jail for not paying child support in Alabama. Learn how contempt of court works, what jail time may result, and what recent court cases reveal about your legal risks when child support payments are missed.

read articles
J.M.M v. State: When Life in Prison is Deserved

J.M.M v. State: When Life in Prison is Deserved

Discover why the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals upheld life sentences for aggravated child abuse in the case of J.M.M. v. State. Learn how courts determine when the maximum penalty is appropriate for child abuse cases involving serious physical injury.

read articles
What is and What Is not First-Degree Assault

What is and What Is not First-Degree Assault

Learn what legally qualifies as first-degree assault in Alabama, and what does not, based on recent appellate court decisions. This article explains the key elements of first-degree assault and why not all injuries involving weapons meet the legal standard for serious physical injury.

read articles
Whistleblower Lawsuits: How You Can Be a Hero & Make Millions

Whistleblower Lawsuits: How You Can Be a Hero & Make Millions

Discover how whistleblowers can expose government fraud under the False Claims Act and potentially earn millions in rewards. Learn your rights, legal options, and how to take action today.

read articles
Mulkey v. State: Appealing the Death Penalty

Mulkey v. State: Appealing the Death Penalty

Learn how Alabama appellate courts review death penalty cases and plain error claims. Mulkey v. State shows how appellate safeguards protect defendants’ rights in capital murder appeals.

read articles
Pig-Butchering: A Modern Bank Robbery

Pig-Butchering: A Modern Bank Robbery

Discover how a sophisticated "pig butchering" scam orchestrated by a Malaysian crime syndicate led to a $65 million digital heist. Learn about legal remedies, victim rights, and landmark court cases offering hope for recovering stolen cryptocurrency.

read articles
Sex Offender Restrictions: Can They Be Unconstitutional

Sex Offender Restrictions: Can They Be Unconstitutional

The Eleventh Circuit ruled a key Alabama sex offender statute unconstitutional, affirming a father’s right to live with his child. Learn how criminal appeals can protect your rights.

read articles
Juvenile Justice? The case of K.A v. State of Alabama

Juvenile Justice? The case of K.A v. State of Alabama

A look into Alabama’s juvenile justice system through the case of K.A.—examining Miranda rights, sentencing, and the court’s duty to balance justice and rehabilitation.

read articles
The Difficulties of Maintaining a Summary Judgment

The Difficulties of Maintaining a Summary Judgment

Learn how a seemingly simple legal win through summary judgment was reversed in Alonso v. Alpha Phi due to unresolved factual disputes and procedural missteps.

read articles
 The Limitations on Criminal Confessions

The Limitations on Criminal Confessions

Learn how the Corpus Delicti rule protects your rights in DUI and drug confession cases. Joe Ingram Law explains how improper police procedures can render a confession inadmissible—and help you beat your charge.

read articles
Taylor v. Humpries: A Failure of Equity and Common Sense.

Taylor v. Humpries: A Failure of Equity and Common Sense.

Explore Taylor v. Humphries, a controversial Alabama court case where a disabled U.S. citizen was denied a state ID due to bureaucratic barriers. This article examines how rigid legal formalism can undermine equity, common sense, and public trust in the justice system.

read articles
Child Custody Across State Lines

Child Custody Across State Lines

Learn how child custody jurisdiction works across state lines under the UCCJEA. Discover how Alabama courts can retain authority even after one parent relocates, and what legal rights you have when custody orders are challenged in another state.

read articles
Custodial Sexual Misconduct and The Sex Offender Registry

Custodial Sexual Misconduct and The Sex Offender Registry

Charged with custodial sexual misconduct in Alabama? Learn how a conviction can put you on the sex offender registry, what recent court cases mean for your future, and why legal reform is urgently needed.

read articles
Enforcing Arbitration Agreements Against a Third Party

Enforcing Arbitration Agreements Against a Third Party

Learn how Alabama law treats arbitration agreements in estate litigation. Discover when third parties—like executors—can be bound by a decedent’s arbitration clause.

read articles
When Can A Police Officer Use Deadly Force?

When Can A Police Officer Use Deadly Force?

Learn when a police officer can legally use deadly force under the Fourth Amendment. Explore key court rulings and constitutional standards in this high-profile Eleventh Circuit case.

read articles
Clearing Your Record in Alabama: What You Need to Know About Expungement

Clearing Your Record in Alabama: What You Need to Know About Expungement

Learn how to expunge a criminal record in Alabama. Discover eligibility rules, filing steps, costs, and how expungement can give you a fresh start. Get expert legal help.

read articles
HB247 Lulu’s Law: Irrational, But Beautiful

HB247 Lulu’s Law: Irrational, But Beautiful

Discover how Alabama’s Lulu’s Law established a shark attack monitoring and emergency alert system for the state’s coastal counties. Learn why this unique legislation, inspired by community advocacy after a tragic incident, reflects the power of local voices in shaping state policy. Explore the case’s impact, legislative background, and what it means for public safety on Alabama beaches.

read articles
Right to Counsel: When has this right been breached?

Right to Counsel: When has this right been breached?

Understand when the constitutional right to counsel applies in criminal cases. Learn from the recent Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals decision in Russell v. State about the critical stages where legal representation is required.

read articles
Can Prison Sentence Reductions Cross State Lines

Can Prison Sentence Reductions Cross State Lines

Discover whether prison sentence reductions can transfer across state lines. Learn about a key 2025 Alabama case that clarifies how correctional incentives apply when inmates move between states.

read articles
When is evidence sufficient to revoke probation?

When is evidence sufficient to revoke probation?

Learn when evidence is sufficient to revoke probation, based on a key 2025 Alabama court ruling. Understand the role of hearsay, probation violations, and legal standards in probation revocation cases.

read articles
Restitution and Evidence: When Is There Enough Evidence For Restitution

Restitution and Evidence: When Is There Enough Evidence For Restitution

Learn when restitution orders are legally valid under Alabama law. Discover why evidence and a proper hearing are essential before courts can require repayment to victims in criminal cases.

read articles
Understanding Cybercrime Charges and Digital Defense Strategies

Understanding Cybercrime Charges and Digital Defense Strategies

Facing cybercrime allegations? Learn the types of cybercrime charges, potential penalties, and how Joe Ingram Law LLC builds strong digital defense strategies. Summary Description: Explore how Joe Ingram Law LLC defends against cybercrime allegations with expert knowledge of digital forensics, hacking laws, identity theft, and data breaches.

read articles
The Interplay Between Plea Agreements and Aggravating Factors

The Interplay Between Plea Agreements and Aggravating Factors

Attorney Teresa Darwin Phillips pleaded guilty to theft, deception, and elder exploitation in Alabama. Learn how her failure to pay restitution impacted her sentencing and why the court upheld late notice of aggravating factors.

read articles
Running From The Cops: When is it 3rd Degree Felony Escape?

Running From The Cops: When is it 3rd Degree Felony Escape?

Facing charges for running from the police? Learn when fleeing becomes third-degree felony escape in Alabama and how recent court rulings may affect your case.

read articles
HB49’s Deadly Challenge Against the Supreme Court

HB49’s Deadly Challenge Against the Supreme Court

Alabama’s HB49 challenges Supreme Court precedent by proposing the death penalty for child rape. Learn how this controversial bill could reshape capital punishment law nationwide.

read articles
Default Judgment Divorce in Alabama: How Can You Avoid It?

Default Judgment Divorce in Alabama: How Can You Avoid It?

Learn how a default judgment in divorce can leave you with nothing if you don’t respond to legal filings. Discover how one Alabama court reversed such a judgment—and why immediate legal action is critical to protect your rights.

read articles
Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice

Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice

Explore how the justice system safeguards fairness through appellate review in United States v. Gregory, a federal drug trafficking case that reveals key protections for defendants and the power of appeals in correcting trial court errors.

read articles
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles
Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

In a case that highlights the complex issues of marital property division during divorce proceedings, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the appeal of Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr. Arising from Baldwin County, this case addresses the appeals of both the husband and the wife, demonstrating the intricate nature of property classification and division through six main points of contention. If you need a Divorce Lawyer, Please contact us about your case.

read articles
The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

In a case that highlights broader systemic issues in the American justice system, the United States Supreme Court recently declined to review a controversial Alabama murder conviction. At this stage, the case of McCrory v. Alabama has been tumultuous for a man who continues to maintain his innocence. The increasing public attention directed towards the challenges defendants face when seeking exonerations is creating legislative pressure for reform, offering hope for a more just future.

read articles
latest-news

Pretrial Matters in Federal Court: How to Make Bond, Detention Hearings, and other Pretrial Functions

18 U.S.C. §3154 describes the functions and powers relating to pretrial services. The statute includes 14 particular functions, and a broader clause allowing the performance of any other functions specified under the chapter.

read articles
latest-news

The Interplay Between Lesser-Included Offenses and Double Jeopardy: The Case of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama

In a case that provides important clarification about double jeopardy when certain charges were reduced to their lesser-included offenses, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over the appeal of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama.

read articles
The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama

The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama

In a case that clarifies the bounds of jurisdiction for mandamus petitions, the Alabama Court of Appeals recently heard an appeal arising from Mobile County. This case, Ex Parte State of Alabama, explores trial court jurisdiction time limits without a stay, defining when new judgments can be issued, and orders enforced.

read articles
The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination

The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination

In a case that illustrates the high bar for terminating parental rights in child custody matters, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Baldwin County. This case, W.C.M. v. M.P., addresses a mother’s efforts to terminate the father’s parental rights, highlighting the complex and sensitive nature of proceedings seeking extreme legal remedies.

read articles
180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe

180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe

In a case addressing multiple facets of criminal procedure, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from DeKalb County. This case, Travis Eugene Wolfe v. State of Alabama, demonstrates the breadth of trial court discretion when compounding consecutive sentences, while exploring the procedural and evidentiary requirements forming the basis for Wolfe’s conviction.

read articles

schedule a consultation

Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.