In a case that illustrates the high bar for terminating parental rights in child custody matters, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Baldwin County. This case, W.C.M. v. M.P., addresses a mother’s efforts to terminate the father’s parental rights, highlighting the complex and sensitive nature of proceedings seeking extreme legal remedies.
M.P., the mother, and W.C.M., the father, had a child, E.H.P. out of wedlock. In July 2021, the mother petitioned the court to terminate the father’s parental rights. As the basis for her motion, the mother alleged that the father had failed to involve himself in the child’s life, citing her own failed efforts to provide visitation to the father. Her petition was granted following a multi-session trial, which concluded in July 2023 when the father’s rights were terminated. The father filed a post judgment motion challenging the decision, which was denied, giving rise to this appeal.
On appeal, the Court examined the two-prong test for terminating parental rights, which mandates (1) grounds for termination as specified under §12-15-319(a) of the Alabama Code, and (2) consideration of all viable alternatives. This test is designed to make termination a last-resort option for courts, with the child’s well-being remaining a central focus of legal analysis. The Court found that although the mother had presented evidence of abandonment—demonstrating the father’s sporadic contact and failure to utilize visitation opportunities –the second prong of the test was not clearly established by evidence. As a result, the Court reversed the lower court’s decision to terminate the father’s parental rights and remanded the case.
W.C.M. v. M.P. demonstrates the stringent standard that must be met to justify extreme legal remedies, such as the termination of parental rights. In child custody matters, the child’s well being is the paramount consideration and outweighs other relevant factors, even when those factors are supported by evidence. In this case, the Court could not uphold the termination of the father’s parental rights because termination was not demonstrated to be in the child’s best interest. When entangled in any sort of legal proceeding involving child custody, it is crucial to keep this principle in mind, and thoroughly prove that the proposed remedy serves the child’s best interest.
If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640. Get Relief * Get Results.
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
