As in many cases one party may file a complaint and the defendant does not file an answer within 30 days. If the defendant does not file an answer in time, the plaintiff will file for a default judgment for the lack of the defendant not answering the Complaint. The court generally does not like Default Judgments in divorce cases because the court believes that both sides deserve due process and a chance to be heard in court. There are more default judgments thrown out in divorce court than in any other type of case.
In the case of Quintana v. Quiroz from Jefferson County, Alabama, the mother filed a complaint seeking to receive custody of her three children. The father filed an answer to the complaint and a counterclaim in which he alleged that the parties have been married since August of 2007. The father was seeking custody of the children as well as child support. The trial court entered a pendente light order in which it awarded the mother and the father alternating weeks of physical custody.
The trial court said the matter for a final hearing on November 26, 2019. The father and his attorney appeared for the trial but the mother or her lawyer did not appear. The trial court entered a divorce judgment in which it awarded custody of all three children to the father, awarded the mother visitation at the discretion of the father and the and the father's attorney was awarded a $4,500 attorney fee. The mother filed a motion to set aside the default judgment.
The mother and her attorney argued that the dates were confused with a hearing set for a PFA hearing. The court denied the mother’s post-trial motion. The mother appealed the decision.
The appellate court ruled ex meru motu, which means on its own accord, that the default judgment was not a final judgment and therefore the divorce was set aside. As a matter the appellate court ruled that it was a long standing precedent that default judgment’s entered in divorce actions, particularly those involving child custody, should be set aside.
The appellate court ruled that the father had requested child support and the trial court neglected to order the mother to pay child support. The court ruled “where a party has requested child support and the trail court’s judgment does not contain a conclusive child support obligation, the trail court has not completely addressed the matters between the parties. Therefore the appeal was dismissed on the merits.
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
