What Is Cybercrime?
Cybercrime refers to any criminal activity that involves a computer, network, or digital system as a tool, target, or place of commission. These offenses range in scope from low-level online harassment to large-scale financial crimes.
Common Types of Cybercrime Charges Include:
- Hacking and Unauthorized Access
Gaining access to systems, networks, or devices without permission. Often charged under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). - Identity Theft and Online Fraud
Using someone else’s personal information—like Social Security numbers or credit card data—for financial gain. - Data Breaches and Privacy Violations
Illegally accessing or exposing sensitive information from corporate databases, government systems, or healthcare records. - Cyberstalking and Online Harassment
Threatening, harassing, or spying on others via digital means, including emails, social media, and surveillance software. - Phishing and Email Scams
Fraudulently obtaining information or money through fake emails, links, or impersonation schemes. - Cryptocurrency-Related Crimes
These include digital money laundering, illegal initial coin offerings (ICOs), and crypto-based investment fraud.
Penalties for Cybercrime Convictions
The penalties for cybercrimes vary widely depending on the charges, the scale of the alleged activity, and whether the case is prosecuted at the state or federal level. Common consequences include:
- Prison time (often 5–20 years for federal offenses)
- Heavy fines (ranging from thousands to millions of dollars)
- Probation or supervised release
- Restitution to victims
- Forfeiture of assets or digital devices
- Permanent criminal record and employment restrictions
Because the stakes are so high, it is critical to have a defense team with technical knowledge as well as legal experience in cybercrime prosecution and defense.
Digital Evidence: A Double-Edged Sword
In cybercrime cases, digital evidence is central—but it can also be flawed. Many prosecutors and law enforcement agencies rely on:
- IP addresses
- Device metadata
- Browser history
- Email logs and attachments
- File timestamps
- Social media messages
However, IP addresses can be spoofed. Devices can be hacked. Metadata can be manipulated. Innocent people may be wrongly tied to illegal activity simply because someone else used their internet connection, or because they were unaware of what was happening on their device.
Our firm works with forensic experts, cybersecurity consultants, and IT professionals to uncover the truth and challenge flawed digital evidence in court.
How Joe Joe Ingram Law, LLC Builds Your Cybercrime Defense
A cybercrime defense isn’t just about arguing innocence—it’s about strategically challenging the prosecution’s assumptions and evidence. Here’s how we approach it:
1. Deep Dive into the Forensic Record
We examine hard drives, emails, devices, and digital footprints for inconsistencies, errors, or signs of tampering.
2. Investigating the Investigation
Was a valid search warrant issued? Were your rights violated during a digital search or seizure? We scrutinize law enforcement’s methods from start to finish.
3. Challenging Intent
Many cybercrime statutes require proving intent to defraud, harm, or gain unauthorized access. We often find that clients lacked the intent or knowledge required to be guilty of a crime.
4. Presenting Alternate Explanations
In shared devices or open networks, the digital trail may not lead to you at all. We uncover alternative users, hacked access points, or software bugs.
5. Plea Negotiation or Trial
When appropriate, we negotiate favorable resolutions—reduced charges or diversion programs. But we are fully prepared to take cybercrime cases to trial and fight for your exoneration.
When to Call a Cybercrime Defense Lawyer
If you’ve been contacted by investigators, received a target letter, or had your devices seized, don’t wait. Contact a cybercrime defense attorney before speaking to law enforcement.
Even if you haven’t been charged yet, early intervention can make a significant difference in how your case proceeds.
Joe Joe Ingram Law, LLC: Your Digital Defense Starts Here
With the rapid pace of technological change, the legal landscape of cybercrime is shifting every day. At Joe Joe Ingram Law, LLC, we stay at the forefront of digital defense—combining legal skill, technical insight, and courtroom experience to protect your future.
Can Prison Sentence Reductions Cross State Lines
Discover whether prison sentence reductions can transfer across state lines. Learn about a key 2025 Alabama case that clarifies how correctional incentives apply when inmates move between states.
read articles
When is evidence sufficient to revoke probation?
Learn when evidence is sufficient to revoke probation, based on a key 2025 Alabama court ruling. Understand the role of hearsay, probation violations, and legal standards in probation revocation cases.
read articles
Restitution and Evidence: When Is There Enough Evidence For Restitution
Learn when restitution orders are legally valid under Alabama law. Discover why evidence and a proper hearing are essential before courts can require repayment to victims in criminal cases.
read articles
Understanding Cybercrime Charges and Digital Defense Strategies
Facing cybercrime allegations? Learn the types of cybercrime charges, potential penalties, and how Joe Ingram Law LLC builds strong digital defense strategies. Summary Description: Explore how Joe Ingram Law LLC defends against cybercrime allegations with expert knowledge of digital forensics, hacking laws, identity theft, and data breaches.
read articles
The Interplay Between Plea Agreements and Aggravating Factors
Attorney Teresa Darwin Phillips pleaded guilty to theft, deception, and elder exploitation in Alabama. Learn how her failure to pay restitution impacted her sentencing and why the court upheld late notice of aggravating factors.
read articles
Running From The Cops: When is it 3rd Degree Felony Escape?
Facing charges for running from the police? Learn when fleeing becomes third-degree felony escape in Alabama and how recent court rulings may affect your case.
read articles
HB49’s Deadly Challenge Against the Supreme Court
Alabama’s HB49 challenges Supreme Court precedent by proposing the death penalty for child rape. Learn how this controversial bill could reshape capital punishment law nationwide.
read articles
Default Judgment Divorce in Alabama: How Can You Avoid It?
Learn how a default judgment in divorce can leave you with nothing if you don’t respond to legal filings. Discover how one Alabama court reversed such a judgment—and why immediate legal action is critical to protect your rights.
read articles
Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice
Explore how the justice system safeguards fairness through appellate review in United States v. Gregory, a federal drug trafficking case that reveals key protections for defendants and the power of appeals in correcting trial court errors.
read articles
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articles
Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.
In a case that highlights the complex issues of marital property division during divorce proceedings, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the appeal of Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr. Arising from Baldwin County, this case addresses the appeals of both the husband and the wife, demonstrating the intricate nature of property classification and division through six main points of contention. If you need a Divorce Lawyer, Please contact us about your case.
read articles
The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence
In a case that highlights broader systemic issues in the American justice system, the United States Supreme Court recently declined to review a controversial Alabama murder conviction. At this stage, the case of McCrory v. Alabama has been tumultuous for a man who continues to maintain his innocence. The increasing public attention directed towards the challenges defendants face when seeking exonerations is creating legislative pressure for reform, offering hope for a more just future.
read articlesPretrial Matters in Federal Court: How to Make Bond, Detention Hearings, and other Pretrial Functions
18 U.S.C. §3154 describes the functions and powers relating to pretrial services. The statute includes 14 particular functions, and a broader clause allowing the performance of any other functions specified under the chapter.
read articlesThe Interplay Between Lesser-Included Offenses and Double Jeopardy: The Case of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama
In a case that provides important clarification about double jeopardy when certain charges were reduced to their lesser-included offenses, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over the appeal of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama.
read articles
The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama
In a case that clarifies the bounds of jurisdiction for mandamus petitions, the Alabama Court of Appeals recently heard an appeal arising from Mobile County. This case, Ex Parte State of Alabama, explores trial court jurisdiction time limits without a stay, defining when new judgments can be issued, and orders enforced.
read articles
The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination
In a case that illustrates the high bar for terminating parental rights in child custody matters, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Baldwin County. This case, W.C.M. v. M.P., addresses a mother’s efforts to terminate the father’s parental rights, highlighting the complex and sensitive nature of proceedings seeking extreme legal remedies.
read articles
180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe
In a case addressing multiple facets of criminal procedure, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from DeKalb County. This case, Travis Eugene Wolfe v. State of Alabama, demonstrates the breadth of trial court discretion when compounding consecutive sentences, while exploring the procedural and evidentiary requirements forming the basis for Wolfe’s conviction.
read articles
Drug Crimes in Alabama Both State and Federal Charges
In Alabama, drugs are everywhere, both recreational and illegal. Drug charges carry significant jail time for distribution and trafficking, Alabama also criminalizes a wide array of drug offenses. Drug possession and sale offenses are covered by §13A-12-210 to §13A-12-219 of the Alabama Code.
read articles
Evidence of Prejudice: Joseph Michael Wilson and the Importance of Supporting Both Prongs of the Strickland Test
In a case highlighting the extensive requirements to succeed under a Rule 32 petition, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Madison County. This case, Joseph Michael Wilson v. State of Alabama, illustrates the high evidentiary bar that criminal defendants must meet when alleging prejudice arising from ineffective assistance of counsel, demonstrating the high level of deference courts give to attorneys when determining trial strategy.
read articlesMens Rea: The Importance of Proving Intent In a Criminal Case
If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640.
read articlesRape And Sex Crimes in Alabama
Alabama law criminalizes a variety of sexual offenses, the most severe charges being for rape and sodomy. Charges for rape and sodomy in Alabama are classified based on the degree of the offense. Rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, governed by §13A-6-61 and §13A-6-63 respectively, are both classified as Class A felonies.
read articlesFraud In a Divorce: Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts
In a case that clarifies the court’s power to address acts of fraud, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal originating in Mobile County. This case, Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts, addresses fraud in the context of a divorce judgment, emphasizing the court’s authority to handle such scenarios.
read articlesConstitutional Standing and Proof of Intent: The Case of Johnnie Leeanozg DavisConstitutional Standing and Proof of Intent: The Case of Johnnie Leeanozg Davis
In a case that clarifies several principles of criminal procedure, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.
read articles
Double Jeopardy in a Single Trial: The Case of Altonio Spencer
In a case that illustrates the interplay of Alabama’s sentencing laws, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard an appeal originating in Mobile County. This case, Altonio Spencer v. State of Alabama, explores the proper application of the Habitual Felony Offenders Act and clarifies the Double Jeopardy Clause’s applicability when one conviction is included within another.
read articlesFederal Sex Crimes: Offenses, Penalties, and SORNA
18 U.S.C. Pt I, Ch. 109A covers federal sexual abuse crimes. Sexual abuse, codified in §2242, criminalizes three types of conduct. First, the section criminalizes using threats or fear to coerce another person to engage in a sexual act.
read articles
Definitions: Exploring the Effect of Statutory Language on Protection Orders
In a case that dives into evidentiary standards and proper applications of the law, a case arising from Lee County recently made its way to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals. In the case of P.T.S. III v. S.S., the Court reviewed an elder-abuse protection order, clarifying evidentiary requirements and addressing the relevance and applicability of the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act.
read articlesSex Crimes And Computer Crimes in Alabama
Sexual Offenses are also recognized based on their relationship to technology. §13A-6-111 criminalizes transmitting obscene materials to a child by computer, classifying the crime as a Class B felony.
read articlesConcurrent Split Sentences: Interpreting Sentencing Guidelines in Alabama Criminal Cases
In a case that clarifies the permissibility of concurrent split sentences, the Supreme Court of Alabama recently presided over the case of Ex parte Courtney Rayshun Elston.
read articles
Revocation Procedure: The Delicate Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Due Process
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from Marion County, affirming the enduring significance of procedural rights in revocation proceedings. This case, Brandon Colby Hayes v. State of Alabama, clarifies the procedural necessity of a formal revocation hearing for community-corrections placements, thereby extending the policy for probation revocation in this area.
read articlesTHCA: The Unaddressed Cannabinoid in Federal Hemp Legislation
Six years ago, the Hemp Farming Act of 2018 went into effect as federal law, legalizing certain marijuana derivatives as “hemp.”
read articles
FaceTime Testimony: The Procedural Limits of Audiovisual Technology
In a case exploring the procedural side of child custody, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal that began in the Cullman Juvenile Court in Cullman County. The case of T.S. v. Cullman County Department of Human Resources and D.W. delves into the admissibility of remote testimony under relevant Alabama law, which permits such testimony only under specific compelling circumstances.
read articlesMurder, Manslaughter And Criminally Negligent Homicide in Alabama
In Alabama, there are three major criminal charges associated with homicide. The first and most severe is murder, governed by §13A-6-2 of the Alabama Code. Unlike some other jurisdictions, Alabama does not recognize varying degrees of murder.
read articles
Calls for Reform: Background Checks in the Case of Chrisopher Bauer
Alabama law enforcement is facing calls for reform in their hiring process. The public response was inspired when FBI agent Christopher Bauer was convicted last month for sexually assaulting a minor while employed as a state trooper. Bauer’s sentencing, potentially facing life imprisonment, is set for the beginning of August. Bauer began working for the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency in 2019, after state police conducted “a full and thorough” background check. However, Bauer had been fired from the FBI in New Orlean’s the previous year due to allegations of sexual assault, harassment, and several other policy violations, with his victims providing harrowing testimony detailing the encounters. In spite of this record, Bauer was still able to gain employment with the Alabama state police, raising questions about the system of background checks and inter-agency communication practices currently in place.
read articlesDefinition of Domestic Violence
Domestic violence is a pervasive issue that manifests in various forms, affecting individuals regardless of age, gender, or socioeconomic status.
read articles
Demystifying the Burden of Proof: Lessons from Duarel Kelly’s Probation Revocation
In a case emphasizing the importance of meeting the evidentiary burden in all criminal proceedings, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals recently heard the appeal of Daurel Eugene Kelly v. State of Alabama, arising from Baldwin County. Kelly’s appeal underscores the high standard of proof required in probation revocation hearings, following the same principles as other criminal proceedings.
read articles
Domestic Violence Charges in Alabama
The Alabama Code also criminalizes specific violent offenses within the home and family. Alabama recognizes three degrees of domestic violence, criminalizing actions against current and former spouses, relatives, household members, and former and current romantic partners, with all three degrees covering different crimes against this same group.
read articlesschedule a consultation
