Divorce proceedings are often complex and emotionally charged, especially when it comes to legal technicalities like service of process and default judgments. The recent case of Fred M. Long vs. Teresa Carol Long in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama offers a compelling example of these complexities. This case not only highlights the importance of understanding the intricacies of family law but also underscores the need for skilled legal representation in navigating these waters.
In September 2021, Teresa Carol Long filed for divorce from her husband, Fred M. Long. The legal journey that followed was marked by challenges in serving the divorce papers. Despite several attempts to serve Mr. Long at his listed Tuscaloosa address, he was reportedly evasive. The court, noting his avoidance, granted a default judgment in favor of Mrs. Long.
However, the plot thickened when Mr. Long filed for relief from this judgment, claiming he had not lived at the Tuscaloosa address since before the initial summons and was unaware of the proceedings. His appeal brought to light the critical issue of due process and proper service in divorce cases.
On March 15, 2023, the trial court denied Mr. Long's motion to set aside the default judgment. He quickly filed a motion to reconsider, leaning on the precedent set by Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Authority Sewer Service, Inc., to argue for vacating the judgment under Rule 55(c). The court, however, stood firm on its decision, stating that Mr. Long had indeed avoided service and that his due-process rights were not violated.
The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, emphasizing the meticulous compliance of Mrs. Long and the trial-court clerk with the procedural requirements for serving divorce papers. This decision underlines the significance of following legal procedures to the letter, especially in sensitive cases like divorce.
The Long vs. Long case serves as a crucial reminder of the complexities inherent in family law. It underscores the importance of having knowledgeable legal counsel to guide one through the maze of divorce proceedings.
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
