Montgomery, Alabama Court Reversed on Child Support Calculation

No image available
An appeal overturned a child support reduction after a father failed to submit income documents. The court ruled the calculation lacked evidence and reversed the decision.

This is an appeal from Montgomery County, Alabama regarding child support in the case of Farquhar. The parties were married and originally divorced in 2011. The father was ordered to pay child support in the amount of $1,050 per month to the mother. It does not appear that an Income Withholding Order was originally entered in the case.

In 2012, the mother filed a petition of contempt and for an Income Withholding Order to be entered in the case. At a hearing of the matter, the father did not submit to the court a CS 41 Income Affidavit. The Court found the father in contempt for failure to pay child support and reduced the amount to $704.55 per month plus $94.45 in arrearage.

The mother appealed the order and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s order. First, the father did not submit a CS 41 Income Affidavit. The appellate court held that it was impossible for the court to determine the child support without knowing the income of the father. Further, the court held “When a judgment of arrearage ‘contains no indication of how the court determined the amounts that it did’ and the court’s calculation of arrearage has no support in the evidence the judgment is due to be reversed.” State Dept. of Human Res. ex rel. Briley v. Dobbins, 628 So.2d 931, 932 (Ala. Civ. App. 1993).

It this case, the father represented himself and it is possible that he did not submit a CS 41 Income Affidavit to the court by accident. However, there is no way that the trial court would be able to justify lowering the child support over $200.00 without some decrease in pay of the father. The other fundamental error in the trial court’s order was for the calculation of arrearage without any justification as to the amount the father was in arrears. There would have had to be some testimony regarding the father’s failure to pay child support as ordered.

In any modification of child support, both parents are required to submit a CS 41 Income Affidavit as proof of income under oath. Also, the court requires a CS 42 form which is a worksheet to determine the amount of child support that should be paid by the non-custodial parent. In this case, neither of the forms were filed with the trial court.

The only good news in this case is that the father represented himself and will not have to pay any attorney fees to the mother. If you are a parent and believe that you are due an increase or a decrease in a child support, please feel free to contact my office to evaluate your case. It is not unusual as children become more involved in extracurricular activities that an increase in child support is warranted in some cases.

In some situations, a review of the child support guidelines can be worth thousands of dollars a year in your pocket. A good rule of thumb is to take your monthly expenses for your child and add them up to see if an increase in child support is warranted. Call my office for an initial consultation at (205) 303-1753.

articles

latest news & insights

1 / 9
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles

schedule a consultation

Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.