Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Reverses Defendant's Conviction for Sodomy by Forcible Compulsion

Image related with this article: Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Reverses Defendant's Conviction for Sodomy by Forcible Compulsion
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed a defendant’s conviction for sodomy by forcible compulsion, ruling insufficient evidence of force or threats, but upheld another sodomy conviction.

In 2012, Eric Higdon, who was 17 years old, worked as an intern at Momma’s Place Christian Academy, a day-care facility. During that time, K.S., who was then four years old, was enrolled as a student at the day care. During August 2012, Higdon accompanied K.S. to the bathroom on multiple occasions. While in the bathroom, Higdon pulled down K.S.’s pants, touched K.S.’s penis, and performed oral sex on K.S. K.S. did not report Higdon’s actions. In August 2012, A.D., the parent of another child enrolled in the day-care facility, filed a police report alleging that Higdon had performed similar acts on her son. A.D. contacted K.S.’s mother, K.W., to alert her to the allegations against Higdon. K.W. asked K.S. if anyone had touched him inappropriately. K.S. told her that Higdon had touched him.

Higdon was convicted of first-degree sodomy of a child less than 12 years old and first-degree sodomy by forcible compulsion. He was sentenced to concurrent sentences of 23 years in prison for first-degree sodomy of a child less than 12 years old and 15 years for first-degree sodomy by forcible compulsion. appealed. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. Ala. Code 1975, § 13A-6-63(a) provides that a person commits the crime of sodomy in the first degree if he engages in sexual intercourse with another person by forcible compulsion. Section §13A-6-60(8) of the Code of Alabama, defines “forcible compulsion” as a “physical force that overcomes earnest resistance or a threat, express or implied, that places another person in fear of immediate death or serious physical injury to himself or another person.”

In this case, the State failed to present any evidence that Higdon used physical force that overcame K.S.’s earnest resistance. Moreover, the State failed to present any evidence that Higdon made an express threat that “placed K.S. in fear of immediate death or serious physical injury to himself or another person.” In Powe v. State, the Alabama Supreme Court held that an implied threat can be inferred in cases concerning the sexual assault of children by adults with whom the children are in a relationship of trust. In Ex parte J.A.P., 853 So.2d 280 (Ala. 2002), however, the Court clarified that the Powe holding would apply only in cases involving the sexual assault of children by adults who exercised positions of domination and control over the children. In this case, Higdon was only 17 years old when the alleged acts occurred. “Thus, an implied threat may not be inferred as a result of his position as an intern at the day-care facility.” Additionally, an age discrepancy cannot constitute an implied threat. Higdon’s conviction based on the charge of first-degree sodomy by forcible compulsion was reversed. His conviction for first-degree sodomy of a child less than 12 years old was affirmed.

articles

latest news & insights

1 / 9
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles

schedule a consultation

Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.