The Price of Threats: America’s Federal Extortion Statutes

Image related with this article: The Price of Threats: America’s Federal Extortion Statutes
Learn about federal extortion laws under 18 U.S.C. §§ 875-880, covering threats, blackmail, and the use of interstate and foreign communications to extort money or property. Explore the recent Eleventh Circuit case United States v. Smith and penalties for violations, including threats against public officials and officials in the U.S. government.

Title 18 of the United States Code is directed at crimes and criminal procedure. Chapter 41 defines extortion and threats, prohibiting a wide range of communications. Essentially, extortion involves making a threat, with the goal of receiving some form of compensation in connection with the threat. The statutes differentiate between threats of injury, kidnapping, murder, and other violent acts, and threats against property or reputation, coming together to create a comprehensive federal ban on extortion.

Generally, extortion becomes a federal crime when it involves interstate or foreign commerce. 18 U.S.C. §875 is directed at crimes involving interstate communications. Using interstate and foreign channels to demand ransom related to a kidnapping is punishable by up to twenty years in prison. The section also prohibits the use of interstate or foreign channels to threaten kidnapping or injury in order to extort any money or thing of value, which is similarly punishable by up to twenty years in prison. When the threat to kidnap or injure is unrelated to the extortion of money, the offense is punishable by up to five years in prison. Extortion involving threats of property damage or reputational injury is punishable by up to two years in prison. Federal law also prohibits mailing threatening communications 18 U.S.C. §876. If violent threats are sent through the way of the Postal Service, or with the intent to extort money or other things of value, the offense is punishable by up to twenty years in prison. When the threats are addressed to a United States judge, Federal law enforcement officer, or protected United States Officer, the offense is punishable by up to ten years in prison. When the threats are targeted towards property or reputation, rather than physical harm, the offense is punishable by up to ten years in prison.

The Eleventh Circuit confirmed a conviction under §845 in United States v. Smith, No. 23-12991, 2024 WL 1554862 (11th Cir. Apr. 10, 2024). In Smith, the defendant was a software engineer. He used a web application to breach the security of a company, deterring users from using the company’s website. The defendant was able to access internal data and the coordinates of private artificial reefs. Using this information, he made social media posts harming the company’s reputation, which he offered to take down in exchange for deep grouper spots. At trial, the district court defined two elements of extortion: that the defendant knowingly sent a message in interstate commerce containing a threat to damage the reputation of another, and that the defendant did so with the intent to extort something of value. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed these elements, finding that each element had been sufficiently proven.

18 U.S.C. §877 prohibits mailing threatening communications from foreign countries, providing federal law enforcement with channels to enforce United States anti-extortion interests extraterritorially. If violent threats are sent through foreign channels to eventually reach the Postal Service, or with the intent to extort money or something of value, the offense is punishable by up to twenty years in prison. Depositing violent communication is punishable by up to five years in prison, and threats involving reputation or property injury are punishable by up to two years in prison. The coverage and penalties mirror domestic offenses, with §877 expanding the scope of extortion rather than the consequences.

Although other extortion laws provide a cause of action for threats to damage reputation, 18 U.S.C §873 specifically criminalizes blackmail. Blackmail is the use of threats to reveal information to demand money or other things of value. Offenses involving blackmail are punishable by up to one year in prison.

Federal extortion law heavily addresses political figures and public officials. 18 U.S.C §871 prohibits threats against the President, Vice President, President-elect, or any other officer in the order of succession. 18 U.S.C. §879 prohibits threats against former Presidents and their families, the families of the President and Vice President, major candidates for President or Vice President, and anyone else protected by the Secret Service. In either circumstance, offenders face up to five years in prison. 18 U.S.C §878 extends extortion protection to foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons. Under §878, threats of assault are punishable by up to three years in prison, and other violent threats are punishable by up to five years in prison. If the threats are made in connection with an extortionate demand for money or other things of value, the maximum sentence increases to twenty years. 18 U.S.C. §874 protects public works employees, criminalizing the use of force or threat to induce public works employees to give up their compensation. §874 violations are punishable by up to five years in prison.

In addition to protecting public officials from extortion, federal law prohibits extortion from such officials. When an officer or employee of the United States uses the color of office to commit an act of extortion, the officer is in violation of 18 U.S.C. §872 and faces up to one year in prison.

Finally, 18 U.S.C. §880 criminalizes receiving the proceeds of extortion, punishable by between one and three years in prison. Taken collectively with the other anti-extortion statutes, §880 completes the chain, providing a cause of action against any end beneficiaries of the extortion. The comprehensive statutory scheme criminalizes attempts, the threats themselves, facilitating the communication, and receipt of the profits, encompassing a wide range of extortion activity.


articles

latest news & insights

1 / 9
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles

schedule a consultation

Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo
Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.