Federal Controlled Substances: Imports, Exports, and Drug Offenses

Image related with this article: Federal Controlled Substances: Imports, Exports, and Drug Offenses
f you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama, or any federal jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit, including Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, contact Joe Ingram or Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640.

Federal law criminalizes a wide variety of drug offenses, with a significant number penalized under 21 U.S.C. §960. This section encompasses violations of §§825, 952, 953, 955, 957, and 959. Notably, the offenses must be committed knowingly or intentionally, requiring prosecutors to prove the necessary mens rea, or mental state, to commit the offense.

21 U.S.C. §825 is directed at labeling and packing of controlled substances. This section grants authority to the Attorney General to regulate the label for controlled substances and requires distributors to comply with the labeling requirements. Under the section, it is unlawful to distribute controlled substances without proper labeling. Containers must also contain proper warnings and be securely sealed. Manufacturers and distributors are prohibited to mislabel anabolic steroids in particular, excluding products with an approved application under §505(b) or (j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

21 U.S.C. §952 is directed towards the importation of controlled substances. Under the statute, it is unlawful to import into the United States any schedule I or II controlled substance, or any narcotic drug in schedule III, IV, or V, or ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine. The Attorney General has the authority to make exceptions for these substances when necessary for medical, scientific, or other legitimate purposes. Nonnarcotic controlled substances in schedule III, IV, or V is less restricted. Imports must still be for medical, scientific, or legitimate uses, and the importer must follow notification or declaration procedures as required by law.

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a conviction under §952 in United States v. Besson, No. 22-11603, 2023 WL 4580169 (11th Cir. July 18, 2023). In Besson, the defendant conspired with his codefendants to import cocaine. The scheme involved the use of paid couriers, who were enlisted to carry multiple kilograms of cocaine on commercial flights into the United States. During the course of the conspiracy, the defendant and his coconspirators transported between 5 and 15 kilograms of cocaine. Complying with the mandatory minimum sentence associated with the offense, the defendant was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment.

Federal law also criminalizes the exportation of controlled substances under 21 U.S.C. §953. Exportation of narcotic drugs in schedule I, II, III, or IV is broadly restricted. §953 provides certain exceptions to the broad illegality of controlled substance exportation, allowing export to any country which is a party to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the Convention for Limiting the Manufacture and Regulating the Distribution of Narcotic Drugs, the International Opium Convention of 1912 for the Suppression of the Abuses of Opium, Morphine, Cocaine, and Derivative Drugs, or the International Opium Convention signed in 1925. The Attorney General may also extend this recognition to countries that conform with the conventions in their system of controlling drug imports. Narcotic drugs may be exported to holders of permits or licenses from the country of import allowing the import, or when the drug is being used for medical and scientific purposes for which there is actual need. Nonnarcotic schedule I and II substances may be exported to countries where the Attorney General approves the country’s system or importing such substances, so long as the importer is properly licensed to do so. Similarly to narcotic drugs, the Attorney General may make exceptions for medical and scientific necessity. Nonnarcotic controlled substances in schedule III or IV, and any controlled substance in schedule V, are treated less strictly in an exportation context. Such substances may be exported when the importation is not unlawful in the importing country, and proper notification procedure is followed.

Compared to broader import and export laws, 21 U.S.C. §955 is narrow, targeted specifically at vessels, aircraft, and other vehicles going to and from the United States. The statute prohibits onboard possession of any schedule I or II controlled substance or any narcotic drug in schedule III or IV, with exceptions for substances that are part of the vessel’s official supplies or cargo.

21 U.S.C. §957 provides the registration requirements for parties wishing to legally engage in the importation and exportation of controlled substances. In the absence of a registration issued by the Attorney General or a statutorily recognized exception, it is unlawful to import or export any controlled substance or list I chemical. The section extends exceptions to agents and employees of registered companies, as well as contract carriers and warehousemen, so long as the import or export occurs in the usual course of business or employment. Ultimate users entering or exiting the country with controlled substances in their possession for legitimate and prescribed medical use are also exempt from the statute.

The final statute subject to the §960 penalty structed is 21 U.S.C. §959. §959 criminalizes the possession, manufacture, and distribution of controlled substances. In addition to criminalizing manufacture and distribution within the United States, the statute also prohibits distributing listed chemicals with the intent or knowledge that the listed chemical will be used to manufacture a controlled substance that will be manufactured in or unlawfully imported to the United States. The breadth of this criminalization encompasses actions taken outside of the United States’ borders, so long as the offender knows or should reasonably believe that their actions will result in a controlled substance entering the United States.

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a sentence for violating §959 in United States v. Arias, No. 22-14254, 2024 WL 2290027 (11th Cir. May 21, 2024). In Arias, the defendant participated in a transnational drug-trafficking organization. The defendant’s role involved picking up cocaine from Colombian suppliers and coordinating shipment of the drugs into the United States. Although the defendant was not the “organizer and leader,” he played a significant role int the conspiracy, recruiting several of his codefendants to join. On appeal, the defendant’s 151-month sentence was affirmed.

When any of the aforementioned controlled substance crimes are committed, the penalty structure is provided by §960. The penalties are divided by amount, with the statute providing specific quantities of each drug. The first range of penalties applies to offenses involving 1 kilogram or more of a mixture containing heroin; 5 kilograms or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or some combination of the three substances; 280 grams or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or a combination, when the substance has a cocaine base; 100 grams or more of phencyclidine (PCP) or 1 kilogram or more of a PCP mixture; 10 grams or more of a mixture containing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); 400 grams or more of a mixture containing N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or 100 grams or more of a mixture containing any analogue of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide; 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana; or 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. Offenses involving any of the aforementioned controlled substances are punishable by a minimum of 10 years in prison, and as much as a life sentence. If the offender has a previous conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony, the minimum sentence is 15 years’ imprisonment. If the substance causes serious injury or death, the minimum sentence rises to 20 years’ imprisonment, with a mandatory life sentence if the offender has a previous serious drug felony or violent felony. These offenses also carry a fine of up to $10,000,000 for individual defendants and $50,000,000 for defendants who are not individuals. Offenders face a minimum of 5 years of supervised release following release from prison, which doubles if the offender has a prior felony conviction.

The second grouping of §960 penalties are punished less severely than the first grouping. §960(b)(2) encompasses offenses involving 100 grams or more of a mixture containing heroin; 500 grams or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or some combination of the three substances; 28 grams or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or a combination, when the substance has a cocaine base; 10 grams or more of phencyclidine (PCP) or 100 grams or more of a PCP mixture; 1 grams or more of a mixture containing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); 40 grams or more of a mixture containing N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or 10 grams or more of a mixture containing any analogue of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide; 100 kilograms or more of marijuana; or 5 grams or more of methamphetamine. Offenses in this category are punishable by anywhere from 5 to 40 years in prison, which increases to a minimum of 20 years and a maximum of life imprisonment if the substance causes death or serious injury. If the offender has a prior conviction for either a serious drug felony or serious violent felony, the sentence may range from 10 years imprisonment to life imprisonment, with the offender receiving a mandatory life sentence if death or serious injury is caused by the substance. Following release from prison, offenders face at least four years of supervised release, or eight years if the offender has a prior felony conviction. Violations involving the quantities and substances in §960(b)(2) carry a fine of up to $5,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $25,000,000 if the defendant is not an individual.

The final category of offenses includes controlled substances in schedule I or II, gamma hydroxybutyric acid, and flunitrazepam. The penalty for these offenses, codified in §960(b)(3), is a maximum of 20 years imprisonment, which rises to a maximum of 30 years if the offender has a prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony. If the substance causes death or serious injury, the offender faces a minimum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, and as much as life in prison. If the substance causes death or injury and the offender has a prior conviction for a serious felony, the offender faces a mandatory life sentence. Following release from prison, offenders face a minimum of three years of supervised release, which doubles if the offender has a prior felony conviction. §960(b)(3) additionally carries a fine of up to $2,000,000 for individual defendants and $10,000,000 for defendants who are not individuals.

Finally, §960(d) establishes the penalty for importation or exportation offenses broadly. An importation or exportation offense involving a list I chemical with the intention or reasonable belief that a controlled substance will be manufactured from the chemical is punishable by up to 20 years in prison. Other import and export offenses are punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

21 U.S.C. §961 provides additional penalties for violations of 21 U.S.C. §954 and failure to notify the Attorney General of importation or exportation activities under §971. §954 provides that a controlled substance in schedule I may by imported, transferred, or transshipped if the shipment was done for scientific, medical, or legitimate purposes and with prior approval of the Attorney General. Controlled substances in schedule II, III, or IV may also be imported, transferred, or transshipped if the Attorney General is given advance notice, and all regulations are followed. If the violation is committed knowingly or intentionally, the offender may be sentenced to up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $25,000. In the absence of knowledge or intent, the offender is only subjected to the fine as a civil penalty.

If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama, or any federal jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit, including Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Ingram Law, LLC at 205-335-2640. Get Relief * Get Results.

articles

Blogs

1 / 44
Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice

Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice

Explore how the justice system safeguards fairness through appellate review in United States v. Gregory, a federal drug trafficking case that reveals key protections for defendants and the power of appeals in correcting trial court errors.

read articles
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles
Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

In a case that highlights the complex issues of marital property division during divorce proceedings, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the appeal of Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr. Arising from Baldwin County, this case addresses the appeals of both the husband and the wife, demonstrating the intricate nature of property classification and division through six main points of contention. If you need a Divorce Lawyer, Please contact us about your case.

read articles
The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

In a case that highlights broader systemic issues in the American justice system, the United States Supreme Court recently declined to review a controversial Alabama murder conviction. At this stage, the case of McCrory v. Alabama has been tumultuous for a man who continues to maintain his innocence. The increasing public attention directed towards the challenges defendants face when seeking exonerations is creating legislative pressure for reform, offering hope for a more just future.

read articles
latest-news

Pretrial Matters in Federal Court: How to Make Bond, Detention Hearings, and other Pretrial Functions

18 U.S.C. §3154 describes the functions and powers relating to pretrial services. The statute includes 14 particular functions, and a broader clause allowing the performance of any other functions specified under the chapter.

read articles
latest-news

The Interplay Between Lesser-Included Offenses and Double Jeopardy: The Case of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama

In a case that provides important clarification about double jeopardy when certain charges were reduced to their lesser-included offenses, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over the appeal of R.E.F. v. State of Alabama.

read articles
The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama

The Time Limit of Jurisdiction: Insights from Ex Parte State of Alabama

In a case that clarifies the bounds of jurisdiction for mandamus petitions, the Alabama Court of Appeals recently heard an appeal arising from Mobile County. This case, Ex Parte State of Alabama, explores trial court jurisdiction time limits without a stay, defining when new judgments can be issued, and orders enforced.

read articles
The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination

The Child’s Best Interest: The Two-Prong Test for Parental Termination

In a case that illustrates the high bar for terminating parental rights in child custody matters, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Baldwin County. This case, W.C.M. v. M.P., addresses a mother’s efforts to terminate the father’s parental rights, highlighting the complex and sensitive nature of proceedings seeking extreme legal remedies.

read articles
180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe

180 Years: Analyzing the Appeal of Travis Eugene Wolfe

In a case addressing multiple facets of criminal procedure, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from DeKalb County. This case, Travis Eugene Wolfe v. State of Alabama, demonstrates the breadth of trial court discretion when compounding consecutive sentences, while exploring the procedural and evidentiary requirements forming the basis for Wolfe’s conviction.

read articles
Drug Crimes in Alabama Both State and Federal Charges

Drug Crimes in Alabama Both State and Federal Charges

In Alabama, drugs are everywhere, both recreational and illegal. Drug charges carry significant jail time for distribution and trafficking, Alabama also criminalizes a wide array of drug offenses. Drug possession and sale offenses are covered by §13A-12-210 to §13A-12-219 of the Alabama Code.

read articles
Evidence of Prejudice: Joseph Michael Wilson and the Importance of Supporting Both Prongs of the Strickland Test

Evidence of Prejudice: Joseph Michael Wilson and the Importance of Supporting Both Prongs of the Strickland Test

In a case highlighting the extensive requirements to succeed under a Rule 32 petition, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Madison County. This case, Joseph Michael Wilson v. State of Alabama, illustrates the high evidentiary bar that criminal defendants must meet when alleging prejudice arising from ineffective assistance of counsel, demonstrating the high level of deference courts give to attorneys when determining trial strategy.

read articles
latest-news

Mens Rea: The Importance of Proving Intent In a Criminal Case

If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640.

read articles
latest-news

Rape And Sex Crimes in Alabama

Alabama law criminalizes a variety of sexual offenses, the most severe charges being for rape and sodomy. Charges for rape and sodomy in Alabama are classified based on the degree of the offense. Rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, governed by §13A-6-61 and §13A-6-63 respectively, are both classified as Class A felonies.

read articles
latest-news

Fraud In a Divorce: Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts

In a case that clarifies the court’s power to address acts of fraud, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal originating in Mobile County. This case, Ex parte Gage Bruce Roberts, addresses fraud in the context of a divorce judgment, emphasizing the court’s authority to handle such scenarios.

read articles
latest-news

Constitutional Standing and Proof of Intent: The Case of Johnnie Leeanozg DavisConstitutional Standing and Proof of Intent: The Case of Johnnie Leeanozg Davis

In a case that clarifies several principles of criminal procedure, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.

read articles
Double Jeopardy in a Single Trial: The Case of Altonio Spencer

Double Jeopardy in a Single Trial: The Case of Altonio Spencer

In a case that illustrates the interplay of Alabama’s sentencing laws, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard an appeal originating in Mobile County. This case, Altonio Spencer v. State of Alabama, explores the proper application of the Habitual Felony Offenders Act and clarifies the Double Jeopardy Clause’s applicability when one conviction is included within another.

read articles
latest-news

Federal Sex Crimes: Offenses, Penalties, and SORNA

18 U.S.C. Pt I, Ch. 109A covers federal sexual abuse crimes. Sexual abuse, codified in §2242, criminalizes three types of conduct. First, the section criminalizes using threats or fear to coerce another person to engage in a sexual act.

read articles
Definitions: Exploring the Effect of Statutory Language on Protection Orders

Definitions: Exploring the Effect of Statutory Language on Protection Orders

In a case that dives into evidentiary standards and proper applications of the law, a case arising from Lee County recently made its way to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals. In the case of P.T.S. III v. S.S., the Court reviewed an elder-abuse protection order, clarifying evidentiary requirements and addressing the relevance and applicability of the Elder Abuse Protection Order and Enforcement Act.

read articles
latest-news

Sex Crimes And Computer Crimes in Alabama

Sexual Offenses are also recognized based on their relationship to technology. §13A-6-111 criminalizes transmitting obscene materials to a child by computer, classifying the crime as a Class B felony.

read articles
latest-news

Concurrent Split Sentences: Interpreting Sentencing Guidelines in Alabama Criminal Cases

In a case that clarifies the permissibility of concurrent split sentences, the Supreme Court of Alabama recently presided over the case of Ex parte Courtney Rayshun Elston.

read articles
Revocation Procedure: The Delicate Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Due Process

Revocation Procedure: The Delicate Relationship Between Criminal Procedure and Due Process

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal from Marion County, affirming the enduring significance of procedural rights in revocation proceedings. This case, Brandon Colby Hayes v. State of Alabama, clarifies the procedural necessity of a formal revocation hearing for community-corrections placements, thereby extending the policy for probation revocation in this area.

read articles
latest-news

THCA: The Unaddressed Cannabinoid in Federal Hemp Legislation

Six years ago, the Hemp Farming Act of 2018 went into effect as federal law, legalizing certain marijuana derivatives as “hemp.”

read articles
FaceTime Testimony: The Procedural Limits of Audiovisual Technology

FaceTime Testimony: The Procedural Limits of Audiovisual Technology

In a case exploring the procedural side of child custody, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal that began in the Cullman Juvenile Court in Cullman County. The case of T.S. v. Cullman County Department of Human Resources and D.W. delves into the admissibility of remote testimony under relevant Alabama law, which permits such testimony only under specific compelling circumstances.

read articles
latest-news

Murder, Manslaughter And Criminally Negligent Homicide in Alabama

In Alabama, there are three major criminal charges associated with homicide. The first and most severe is murder, governed by §13A-6-2 of the Alabama Code. Unlike some other jurisdictions, Alabama does not recognize varying degrees of murder.

read articles
Calls for Reform: Background Checks in the Case of Chrisopher Bauer

Calls for Reform: Background Checks in the Case of Chrisopher Bauer

Alabama law enforcement is facing calls for reform in their hiring process. The public response was inspired when FBI agent Christopher Bauer was convicted last month for sexually assaulting a minor while employed as a state trooper. Bauer’s sentencing, potentially facing life imprisonment, is set for the beginning of August. Bauer began working for the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency in 2019, after state police conducted “a full and thorough” background check. However, Bauer had been fired from the FBI in New Orlean’s the previous year due to allegations of sexual assault, harassment, and several other policy violations, with his victims providing harrowing testimony detailing the encounters. In spite of this record, Bauer was still able to gain employment with the Alabama state police, raising questions about the system of background checks and inter-agency communication practices currently in place.

read articles
latest-news

Definition of Domestic Violence

Domestic violence is a pervasive issue that manifests in various forms, affecting individuals regardless of age, gender, or socioeconomic status.

read articles
Demystifying the Burden of Proof: Lessons from Duarel Kelly’s Probation Revocation

Demystifying the Burden of Proof: Lessons from Duarel Kelly’s Probation Revocation

In a case emphasizing the importance of meeting the evidentiary burden in all criminal proceedings, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals recently heard the appeal of Daurel Eugene Kelly v. State of Alabama, arising from Baldwin County. Kelly’s appeal underscores the high standard of proof required in probation revocation hearings, following the same principles as other criminal proceedings.

read articles
Domestic Violence Charges in Alabama

Domestic Violence Charges in Alabama

The Alabama Code also criminalizes specific violent offenses within the home and family. Alabama recognizes three degrees of domestic violence, criminalizing actions against current and former spouses, relatives, household members, and former and current romantic partners, with all three degrees covering different crimes against this same group.

read articles
Reversable Error: The Balance Between Prejudicial Evidence and Defendant’s Rights

Reversable Error: The Balance Between Prejudicial Evidence and Defendant’s Rights

In a case illustrating the importance of remedies for errors causing significant prejudice against a criminal defendant, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal originating from the heart of Montgomery County. This case, D.M.G. v. State of Alabama, explores the impact of an extraneous document on a criminal defendant’s trial, ultimately resulting in the grant of a new trial.

read articles
Previous Convictions Can Be Used Against You

Previous Convictions Can Be Used Against You

A previous conviction may be used when you testify in a criminal trial. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Safeguarding Rights: The Role of Evidentiary Rules in the Case of Toney R. Harvell

Safeguarding Rights: The Role of Evidentiary Rules in the Case of Toney R. Harvell

In a case that highlights the importance of evidentiary rules at trial, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently presided over an appeal arising from Madison County. This case, Toney R. Harvell v. City of Huntsville, explores Rule 404(b) of the Alabama Rules of Evidence, illustrating how evidentiary rules can serve as safeguards for defendants’ rights.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Kidnapping in Alabama

Kidnapping is only classified in Alabama using two degrees. The less severe offense, kidnapping in the second degree, is a Class B felony governed by §13A-6-44.

read articles
Human Trafficking and Elder Abuse Crimes in Alabama

Human Trafficking and Elder Abuse Crimes in Alabama

Human trafficking is also heavily addressed within the Alabama Code. Human trafficking in the second degree under §13A-6-153 is classified as a Class B felony, punishable by 2-20 years’ imprisonment. The offense requires an offender to knowingly benefit from participation in a venture for the purpose of servitude, or if an offender knowingly obtains control over another person for the purpose of servitude.

read articles
latest-news

The Case of Fred Plump: Alabama’s Battle Against Political Corruption Continues As Usual

In the conclusion of an intense and high-profile legal battle, former Alabama lawmaker Fred Plump was sentenced to one year and one day in prison, along with three years of supervised release and a $196,150.45 repayment of funds. The sentence reflects Plump’s involvement in a kickback scheme where public funds were diverted from their intended use for community service.

read articles
Rehabilitative vs. Periodic Alimony: The Necessary Findings

Rehabilitative vs. Periodic Alimony: The Necessary Findings

At the heart of Etowah County, a recent case made its way to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, emphasizing the importance of strictly adhering to statutory requirements in divorce proceedings. This case, Nathan Wayne Jones v. Martha Dale Jones, illustrates this concept by analyzing of the alimony award in a divorce judgment and outlining the proper guidelines for awarding periodic and rehabilitative alimony.

read articles
The Crimes of Burglary And Robbery in Alabama

The Crimes of Burglary And Robbery in Alabama

Another major crime is burglary, categorized by varying degrees in Alabama. The most severe burglary charge is burglary in the first degree, governed by §13A-7-5. To commit an act of burglary in the first degree, the offender must knowingly and unlawfully enter or remain in a building with the intent to commit a felony, and must also be armed with explosives, cause physical injury to another, or either use or threaten to use a deadly weapon that the offender is armed with.

read articles

schedule a consultation

Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.