In the early hours of November 10th, 2024, a shooting during Tuskegee University’s homecoming festivities left one dead and sixteen injured. The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency (ALEA) arrested Jaquez Myrick as he was attempting to leave the scene, and later arrested a second man, Jeremiah Williams, in connection with the shooting. Both men were federally charged with possession of a machine gun. Myrick was found with a handgun with a machine gun conversion device, and Williams possessed an AR pistol.
On the morning of the shooting, Tuskegee Police Officer Alan Ashley heard gunfire and ran towards the source of the sound. There, the officer found Jaquez Myrick, holding his modified pistol, along with the body of 18-year-old La’Tavion Jashun Johnson, the victim of the shooting. Myrick also possessed nine magazines, containing thirty rounds each, when arrested. At the time, Myrick admitted to discharging his firearm, but insisted that he had not shot at anyone.
Although the arrests were in connection with the mass shooting, the federal complaint against Myrick did not allege that Myrick shot anyone. Rather, the charges were directed at the firearm he possessed. 18 U.S.C. §922(o) federally prohibits possession or transfer of a machine gun. Under the chapter, the parameters for which firearms are classified as machine guns are defined by the National Firearms Act in 26 U.S.C. §5845(b). The National Firearms Act defines machine guns broadly, encompassing any weapon which automatically shoots, is designed to automatically shoot, or can be restored to automatically shoot more than one shot without manual reloading. Applying this definition, §922(o) prohibits the firearms possessed by both men.
The Tuskegee University homecoming shooting reflects a broader pattern in Alabama firearm sales. Andrew Erdmann, a special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, began investigating machine-conversion devices, like the device possessed by Myrick, in July of 2023. After several months of investigation extending into 2024, law enforcement concluded that such devices were both possessed and distributed in Montgomery. Although Myrick asserted that he purchased the conversion switch, potentially through such channels, Erdmann testified that he believed the weapon was 3D-printed, suggesting the existence of additional channels to manufacture and distribute illegal firearms.
While the events of November 10th were tragic, the Tuskegee community responded with resilience, banding together in the face of violence. The homecoming shooting was the second shooting incident on Tuskegee’s campus in a thirteen-month period, with a previous shooting in September 2023 leaving four injured. The chairperson of Tuskegee University’s board of trustees reminded residents of the importance of community, addressing attendees at a convocation service with the message that “in tough times, people band together and they survive.” Following the shooting, Tuskegee University increased security members, requiring a university ID for any person entering campus. Additionally, the University appointed a new campus security chief, reflecting the University’s desire to avoid future acts of senseless violence.
If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama, or any federal jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit, including Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Ingram Law LLC at 205-825-LAWS or 205-335-2640.
Get Relief * Get Results.
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
