In a case emphasizing the importance of meeting the evidentiary burden in all criminal proceedings, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals recently heard the appeal of Daurel Eugene Kelly v. State of Alabama, arising from Baldwin County. Kelly’s appeal underscores the high standard of proof required in probation revocation hearings, following the same principles as other criminal proceedings.
Daurel Eugene Kelly was convicted of felony driving under the influence and began serving probation in April 2022. During Kelly’s probation, two reports were made alleging further arrests, with the first report detailing a November 2022 arrest for public intoxication and the second describing a June 2023 arrest for attempting to elude law enforcement and leaving the scene of an accident with injuries. As a result of these reports, the circuit court held a revocation hearing in October 2023. Despite lack of evidence for the public intoxication claim, the circuit court found sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims regarding Kelly’s June 2023 arrest, and subsequently revoked Kelly’s probation. Instead, the Court ordered Kelly to serve the remainder of his eight-year sentence in the Alabama Department of Corrections.
On appeal, Kelly argued that his new arrest was not, alone, sufficient grounds to revoke his probation. Kelly supported his argument by citing past cases, asserting that probation revocation requires evidence proving he committed the offense, not just an arrest. Kelly’s revocation was in violation of this standard, relying solely on his arrests during the probationary period, without satisfying the burden of proving that Kelly had actually committed the offenses. Accordingly, the Court reversed the probation revocation order against Kelly.
In addition to the broader ruling on Kelly’s probation, the Court also clarified the application of Rule 27.6(f) of the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure. Under this rule, the Court must produce a written statement of evidence, citing reasons for revocation. However, the Court clarified that oral statements can meet this standard, provided they create a comprehensive record.
Daurel Eugene Kelly v. State of Alabama stands as an important clarification of the burden of proof required to revoke a person’s probation. Although the terms of Kelly’s probation stipulated that Kelly could not commit new offenses, an arrest alone is insufficient to prove a new offense. According to established principles of criminal law, a person can only be penalized for committing an offense when their involvement is supported and substantiated by evidence.
If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640 or 205-506-5590.
Get Relief Get Results.
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
