At the heart of Etowah County, a recent case made its way to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, emphasizing the importance of strictly adhering to statutory requirements in divorce proceedings. This case, Nathan Wayne Jones v. Martha Dale Jones, illustrates this concept by analyzing of the alimony award in a divorce judgment and outlining the proper guidelines for awarding periodic and rehabilitative alimony.
Nathan Wayne Jones and Martha Dale Jones were divorced on December 7, 2023, after both parties had filed. The initial divorce judgment considered the length of the marriage, each party’s ability to be self-supporting, health, age, and the standard of living during the marriage, ultimately awarding the wife $1,250 per month in periodic alimony. However, the judgment did not include a determination that rehabilitative alimony was not feasible. The husband argued that this omission violated §30-2-57 of the Alabama Code, which provides periodic alimony as an option when the court expressly finds that rehabilitative alimony was infeasible.
On appeal, the Court emphasized that rehabilitative alimony is prioritized unless this option is unfeasible. Rehabilitative alimony is designed to support a spouse while they work toward becoming self-supporting and is intended as a temporary solution. The Court referred to the previous case of White v. Jones, which similarly emphasized the necessity of making specific findings to ensure periodic alimony is appropriate. This ruling solidified the court’s duty to consider rehabilitative alimony as an option before rejecting rehabilitative alimony in favor of periodic alimony. Accordingly, the judgment was reversed and remanded with instructions for the trial court to comply with the established standard, requiring the trial court to expressly rule out rehabilitative alimony before granting an award of periodic alimony.
Nathan Wayne Jones v. Martha Dale Jones illustrates the necessity of strict statutory compliance in divorce proceedings. The Alabama Code sets out guidelines for alimony in the interest of maintaining fairness and equity, highlighting the significance of compliance in protecting these interests. Divorce proceedings aim to result in equitable divisions of marital assets, reflecting the needs and contributions of both spouses during and after the marriage. In order to maintain this equitable balance, it is essential for courts to follow the established legislation and guidelines, creating fair and orderly outcomes.
If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case, contact Joe Ingram or Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640. Get Relief * Get Results.
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
