In the conclusion of an intense and high-profile legal battle, former Alabama lawmaker Fred Plump was sentenced to one year and one day in prison, along with three years of supervised release and a $196,150.45 repayment of funds. The sentence reflects Plump’s involvement in a kickback scheme where public funds were diverted from their intended use for community service.
Plump gained notoriety following his election to state office in 2022. After less than a year in office, Plump resigned and pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and obstruction of justice in May 2023. His charges were connected to a plan between Plump, Varrie Johnson Kindall, and Rep. John Rogers, who allegedly worked together to divert roughly $400,000 of public funds. The funds were designated for use in the Jefferson County Community Service Fund but were instead funneled through a baseball league managed by Plump, with half the funds being redirected to Johnson Kindall and Rogers for personal expenses.
Plump was not the only public figure punished for his role in the conspiracy. Rep. Rogers resigned from public office following his own indictment and guilty plea for similar charges. In addition to his resignation, prosecutors in Rogers’ case recommended a 14-month prison term. Johnson Kindall received the greatest sentence of the three accomplices for her role in the scheme. Johnson Kindall was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment, followed by four years of supervised release. Johnson Kindall’s charges also reflected her involvement in a separate case for theft of retirement payments, indicating her extensive involvement in fraudulent activities.
Several factors contributed to Plump’s lighter sentence relative to his accomplices. Plump, unlike Rep. Rogers and Johnson Kindall, did not personally benefit from the fraudulent scheme. Plump also had a history of military service, which served as a mitigating factor in his sentencing. Plump’s attorney emphasized the brief romantic relationship between Plump and Johnson Kindall, arguing that the allure of the relationship led Plump astray from his well-established pattern of community service. Both Plump and Johnson Kindall expressed deep remorse for their involvement in the kickback scheme, owning up to the responsibility for their actions.
While the sentencing of Rep. Rogers still hangs in the balance, the sentences of Plump and Johnson Kindall demonstrate Alabama’s ongoing commitment to battling political corruption. Plump’s story highlights the importance of integrity and accountability in public office, raising questions about Alabama’s options to prevent further abuses of power in the future. Although Plump and his co-conspirators face consequences for their crimes, the broader issue of political corruption remains at the forefront of public attention, creating pressure on the state to address the ethical breaches in the context of the state’s legislative framework.
If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articlesschedule a consultation
