Aniah’s Law
Learn how Aniah’s Law expands judicial authority to deny bail for violent crime suspects in Alabama, enhancing public safety.
Aniah’s Law: What You Need to Know
Aniah’s Law is a significant piece of legislation in Alabama that enhances public safety by expanding the circumstances under which judges can deny bail to individuals accused of violent crimes. Named in memory of Aniah Blanchard, a 19-year-old who was kidnapped and murdered in 2019, this law aims to prevent dangerous offenders from being released while awaiting trial.
How Does Aniah’s Law Work?
Before Aniah’s Law, bail denial was limited to a few specific crimes, such as capital murder. With this new legislation, judges now have the authority to deny bail to defendants charged with serious violent offenses, including:
- Murder
- Kidnapping
- Rape
- Domestic violence
- Human trafficking
This law provides prosecutors with a stronger legal framework to argue against bail for individuals deemed a threat to public safety. However, bail decisions remain at the discretion of the court, ensuring a fair judicial process.
Why Is This Law Important?
Aniah’s Law was enacted to close gaps in the bail system that previously allowed repeat violent offenders to be released, sometimes leading to further crimes. By giving judges broader discretion, this law prioritizes the safety of communities while maintaining the defendant’s right to due process.
At Ingram Law, we stay up to date on legal changes that impact our clients. If you have questions about bail, criminal defense, or any legal matters, our team is here to help.
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction
In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson
In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?
How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.
read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate
In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.
read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney
You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.
read articles
The Crime of Stalking in Alabama
Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.
read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown
In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.
read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence
In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.
read articlesTrademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act
Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.
read articles